ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Utilization of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Segmentation of Median Nerve from Ultrasound Obtained from the Distal Forearm and Wrist.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment, and ultrasound provides a fast, cost-efficient method for visualizing the median nerve. Reliable cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement remains challenging across imaging sites and varying scan qualities, and prior studies report segmentation Dice scores ranging from 0.76 to 0.93. Improving the robustness of automated segmentation is critical for achieving consistent, site-independent CSA assessment. This study evaluates a four-layer U-Net for automated segmentation and CSA estimation at two clinically relevant sites: the wrist crease and distal forearm. A primary dataset of 500 images per site was used to establish baseline performance. A second dataset of 35 wrist and 26 forearm still images was used to test generalizability, followed by intensity-based augmentations (CLAHE, gamma correction, speckle noise). Baseline models were tested on these new stills, and an augmented model was trained and evaluated on the combined datasets. The baseline models performed well on the first dataset but showed markedly reduced generalization on new still images (forearm IoU/Dice: 0.185/0.254; wrist IoU/Dice: 0.137/0.188). The augmented models improved within-set performance (forearm: 0.944/0.971; wrist: 0.951/0.974) and significantly enhanced generalization to new images (forearm: 0.408/0.533; wrist: 0.705/0.820). The final combined dataset models achieved Dice/IoU scores of 0.94/0.89 (forearm) and 0.96/0.92 (wrist). CSA measurements showed excellent to moderate correlation with manual tracings across all datasets. These findings demonstrate that targeted intensity-based augmentation substantially improves model generalization and enables robust, reproducible, and site-independent median nerve segmentation, supporting scalable ultrasound-based CTS assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.