ArticleBiology2025
Malaria Parasite Cell Classification Using Transfer Learning with State-of-the-Art CNN Architectures.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria remains a critical global health challenge for doctors and healthcare practitioners, particularly clinicians involved in initial treatment. Inaccurate diagnosis of malaria-infected cells often leads to delayed or inappropriate treatment, increasing the risk of severe complications or death. Traditional microscopic diagnosis is time-consuming and requires expert skills, resulting in variability and inconsistency in results. These challenges are further complicated by the complexity of malaria symptoms, which overlap with other febrile illnesses, making clinical diagnosis unreliable without laboratory confirmation. To address these challenges, this study explores deep-learning-based approaches, particularly leveraging state-of-the-art pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN) models, for automated malaria parasite detection and classification from microscopic blood smear images. Transfer learning is an effective approach to handling issues such as limited labeled data, time-consuming training, and domain-specific variations in medical image classification. By leveraging pretrained models trained on large-scale datasets like ImageNet, transfer learning enables the reuse of learned features, significantly accelerating the adaptation process for malaria detection and other medical imaging tasks. We used eight pretrained models for malaria parasite classification such as VGG16, VGG19, Inception-v3, ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and Xception. In particular, ResNet-50 and ResNet-101 achieved accuracies of approximately 89%, respectively, while Xception reached around 88% accuracy. In comparison, VGG-16 achieved a lower overall accuracy of about 80% due to a recall trade-off despite high precision. These metrics highlight meaningful improvements over simpler architectures and validate the efficacy of our transfer learning approach for automated malaria detection. The proposed models were fine-tuned on extensive labeled datasets comprising parasitized and uninfected cells. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations were conducted using metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, and support. Our experimental results demonstrate that ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and Xception exhibit strong balanced performance with higher accuracy, while VGG-16 shows a trade-off of high precision but lower recall for parasitized cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.