ArticleBiology2025
A Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures, Fusion Strategies, and Explainable AI for Fine-Grained Macrofungi Classification.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning continuous activation fields from microscopic SEM images of lycoperdioid fungi via CNN-guided neural operator modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was motivated by the persistent difficulty of accurately identifying morphologically similar macrofungi species, which remains a significant challenge in fungal taxonomy and biodiversity monitoring. This study presents a deep learning framework for the automated classification of seven morphologically similar coprinoid macrofungi species. A curated dataset of 1692 high-resolution images was used to evaluate ten state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and three novel fusion models. The Dual Path Network (DPN) achieved the highest performance as a single model with 89.35% accuracy, a 0.8764 Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and a 0.9886 Area Under the Curve (AUC). The feature-level fusion of Xception and DPN yielded competitive results, reaching 88.89% accuracy and 0.8803 MCC, demonstrating the synergistic potential of combining architectures. In contrast, lighter models like LCNet and MixNet showed lower performance, achieving only 72.05% accuracy. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, including Grad-CAM and Integrated Gradients, confirmed that high-performing models focused accurately on discriminative morphological structures such as caps and gills. The results underscore the efficacy of deep learning, particularly deeper architectures and strategic fusion models, in overcoming the challenges of fine-grained visual classification in mycology. This work provides a robust, interpretable computational tool for automated fungal identification, with significant implications for biodiversity research and taxonomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.