ReviewBiology2025
Omics Evidence Chains for Complex Traits in Beef Cattle: From Cross-Layer Colocalization to Genetic Evaluation and Application.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-Genome Resequencing of 299 Large White Pigs Identifies RASAL2 as a Candidate Gene for Feed Efficiency Traits.Animal genetics · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-omics studies have multiplied associations, but many still lack causal resolution and a clear path to application. We present a practical roadmap built on four sequential steps: first, identify signals from genome-wide association studies; second, confirm these signals through regulatory colocalization and transcriptome-wide association analyses; third, integrate the evidence using network analyses and causal inference; and, fourth, test shortlisted candidates through functional and phenotypic validation. The roadmap is supported by three safeguards that make results reliable and reusable: containerized workflows that ensure end-to-end reproducibility, harmonization across batches with concise minimum-information records, and consistent identifier mapping with quality control across data layers. Across four classes of traits-growth and development, carcass and meat quality, reproduction, and environmental adaptation and resilience-we prioritize signals that remain robust across ancestries and environments, highlight modules with explicit regulatory support, and advance candidates that have already progressed to functional testing. Two application tracks follow from this process: integrating stable candidates into selection indices with context-dependent weighting, and recording and targeting mechanistic nodes for nutritional and management interventions. Taken together, this roadmap improves causal interpretability, strengthens cross-population robustness, and shortens the path from statistical association to genetic evaluation and industry uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.