ArticleBiology2025
A Study on the Assembly Mechanisms of Shrub Communities in Coniferous and Broadleaved Forests-A Case Study of Jiangxi, China.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ecological strategies of understory shrubs are critical for maintaining the structure and function of forest understory vegetation. Understanding the assembly mechanisms of these shrub communities is a central issue in modern ecology. To address this, our study was conducted in the typical red soil regions of Jiangxi, China, focusing on secondary forests (including both broadleaved and coniferous types) of similar stand age. We aimed to assess the effects of various environmental factors-such as soil pH, total nitrogen content, bulk density, and understory temperature-along with tree-layer characteristics-including canopy closure, tree species richness, and diameter at breast height (DBH)-on the species composition, functional traits, and phylogenetic structure of the shrub layer. Results showed: One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in functional traits between the two forest types. Specifically, leaf thickness, specific leaf area, and chlorophyll content were significantly higher in the coniferous forest, whereas leaf dry matter content was significantly lower compared to the broadleaved forest (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.