ArticleBiology2025
Combination Ensemble and Explainable Deep Learning Framework for High-Accuracy Classification of Wild Edible Macrofungi.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning continuous activation fields from microscopic SEM images of lycoperdioid fungi via CNN-guided neural operator modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating scanning electron microscopy, explainable deep learning, and ITS sequencing for accurate identification in some species Geastrum.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning ensemble framework for accurate classification of wild poisonous mushroom species.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate identification of wild edible macrofungi is essential for biodiversity conservation, food safety, and ecological sustainability, yet remains challenging due to the morphological similarity between edible and toxic species. In this study, a curated dataset of 24 wild edible macrofungi species was analyzed using six state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and four ensemble configurations, benchmarked across eight evaluation metrics. Among individual models, EfficientNetB0 achieved the highest performance (95.55% accuracy), whereas MobileNetV3-L underperformed (90.55%). Pairwise ensembles yielded inconsistent improvements, highlighting the importance of architectural complementarity. Notably, the proposed Combination Model, integrating EfficientNetB0, ResNet50, and RegNetY through a hierarchical voting strategy, achieved the best results with 97.36% accuracy, 0.9996 AUC, and 0.9725 MCC, surpassing all other models. To enhance interpretability, explainable AI (XAI) methods Grad-CAM, Eigen-CAM, and LIME were employed, consistently revealing biologically meaningful regions and transforming the framework into a transparent decision-support tool. These findings establish a robust and scalable paradigm for fine-grained fungal classification, demonstrating that carefully engineered ensemble learning combined with XAI not only advances mycological research but also paves the way for broader applications in plant recognition, spore analysis, and large-scale vegetation monitoring from satellite imagery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.