ReviewBiomolecules2025
Biofunctionalization of Stem Cell Scaffold for Osteogenesis and Bone Regeneration.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Injectable hydrogels for bone regeneration: from materials design to clinical translation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- A bioactive magnesium alloy scaffold integrated with BMSCs-Loaded 3D microspheres synergistically promotes femoral head osteonecrosis repair by improving the osteogenic-angiogenic microenvironment.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repairing bone defects resulting from trauma, tumor resection, or pathological conditions remains a significant clinical challenge. While conventional bone grafting techniques are constrained by inherent limitations, stem cell-based tissue engineering scaffolds offer a promising therapeutic alternative. The ideal scaffold should not only serve as a structural support but, more importantly, must establish a bioactive microenvironment capable of directing stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Consequently, scaffold biofunctionalization has emerged as a fundamental strategy for achieving effective bone regeneration. This review comprehensively examines the primary materials utilized in bone regeneration scaffolds and systematically analyzes key biofunctionalization approaches, including surface modification, incorporation of bioactive molecules, and integration of functional ions. Moreover, it thoroughly discusses the mechanisms through which biofunctionalized scaffolds modulate stem cell behavior and enhance bone repair in vivo. Finally, the article provides insights into future research directions and emerging trends, aiming to inform the rational design and development of advanced bone regeneration scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.