ArticleCancers2025
Examination of Appendiceal Neoplasms-A Retrospective, Single-Centre, Cohort Study.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sessile serrated lesions of the appendix: a contemporary review of the literature.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Association of Clinical and Laboratory Parameters with Appendiceal Neoplasms in Acute Appendicitis: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAppendiceal neoplasms are rare, but recent data indicate a rising trend, particularly in patients under the age of 50. These tumours are often diagnosed incidentally during histopathological examination. This study has aimed to examine the incidence and histological subtypes of appendiceal neoplasms in a Southern Hungarian population.
methodsOur study included neoplastic appendix specimens processed at the University of Szeged between 2014 and 2023.
resultsNeoplasms were identified in 71 cases from 3640 appendectomies (1.9%). Benign lesions were present in 37% of cases (
conclusionsThe prevalence and characteristics observed in this Southern Hungarian population were consistent with international data, although raw case numbers suggested an upward trend. The high rate of associated colorectal neoplasms underscores the importance of thorough pathological evaluation and long-term surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.