ReviewCancers2025
Oncolytic Viruses in Glioblastoma: Clinical Progress, Mechanistic Insights, and Future Therapeutic Directions.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Circadian-guided oncolytic virotherapy for glioblastoma.Journal of neurovirology · 2026Review
- Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus for Glioblastoma: Molecular Engineering, Tumor Microenvironment Barriers, and Clinical Translation.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma: epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and therapeutic resistance.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Clinical and translational progress in oncolytic virotherapy for pediatric CNS tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Rearming mesenchymal stem cells with engineering strategies to combat cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-grade gliomas-particularly glioblastoma (GBM)-remain refractory to standard-of-care surgery followed by chemoradiation, with a median overall survival of ~15 months. Oncolytic viruses (OVs), which selectively infect and lyse tumor cells while engaging antitumor immunity, offer a mechanistically distinct therapeutic modality. This review synthesizes clinical progress of OVs in GBM, with emphasis on oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV) and coverage of other vectors (adenovirus, reovirus, Newcastle disease virus, vaccinia virus) across phase I-III trials, focusing on efficacy and safety. Key observations include the encouraging clinical trajectory of oHSV exemplars-T-VEC (approved for melanoma) and G47Δ (approved in Japan for recurrent GBM)-the multi-center exploration of the adenovirus DNX-2401 combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade, and the early-stage status of reovirus (pelareorep) and Newcastle disease virus programs. Emerging evidence indicates that oHSV therapy augments immune infiltration within the tumor microenvironment and alleviates immunosuppression, with synergy when combined with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Persistent challenges include GBM's inherently immunosuppressive milieu, limitations imposed by the blood-brain barrier, intrapatient viral delivery and biodistribution, and concerns about viral shedding. Future directions encompass programmable vector design, optimization of systemic delivery, biomarker-guided patient selection, and rational combination immunotherapy. Collectively, OVs represent a promising immunotherapeutic strategy in GBM; further gains will hinge on vector engineering and precision combinations to translate mechanistic promise into durable clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.