Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41463084›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring.

Daniel Simancas-Racines, Náthaly Mercedes Román-Galeano, Juan Pablo Vásquez, Dolores Jima Gavilanes, Rupalakshmi Vijayan, Claudia Reytor-González

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Integrating multi-omics data for next-generation cancer research and precision medicine.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Simancas-RacinesFacultad de Salud y Bienestar, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito 170143, Ecuador.
Náthaly Mercedes Román-GaleanoFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y la Vida, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador UIDE, Quito 170411, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-6417-5550
Juan Pablo VásquezIndependent Researcher, Quito 170102, Ecuador.
Dolores Jima GavilanesEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón 0901952, Ecuador.
Rupalakshmi VijayanSt. Elizabeth Boardman Hospital, Boardman, OH 44512, USA.
Claudia Reytor-GonzálezEscuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Santo Domingo 230203, Ecuador.ORCID 0009-0007-4234-5524

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy and multi-omic biomarker integration are transforming precision oncology in breast cancer, providing real-time, minimally invasive insights into tumor biology. By analyzing circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, exosomal non-coding RNAs, and proteomic or metabolomic profiles, clinicians can monitor clonal evolution, therapeutic response, and recurrence risk in real time. Recent advances in sequencing technologies, methylation profiling, and artificial intelligence-driven data integration have markedly improved diagnostic sensitivity and predictive accuracy. Multi-omic frameworks combining genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data enable early detection of resistance, molecular stratification, and identification of actionable targets, while machine learning models enhance outcome prediction and therapy optimization. Despite these advances, key challenges persist. Pre-analytical variability, lack of standardized protocols, and disparities in access continue to limit reproducibility and clinical adoption. High costs, incomplete regulatory validation, and the absence of definitive evidence for mortality reduction underscore the need for larger, prospective trials. Integrating multi-omic assays into clinical workflows will require robust bioinformatics pipelines, clinician-friendly reporting systems, and interdisciplinary collaboration among molecular scientists, data engineers, and oncologists. In the near future, liquid biopsy is expected to complement, not replace, traditional tissue analysis, serving as a cornerstone of adaptive cancer management. As sequencing becomes faster and more affordable, multi-omic and AI-driven analyses will allow earlier detection, more precise treatment adjustments, and continuous monitoring across the disease course. Ultimately, these innovations herald a shift toward real-time, data-driven oncology that personalizes breast cancer care and improves patient outcomes.

Indexed as

breast cancerhealthcareliquid biopsymulti-omic biomarkersprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41463084
PMCPMC12730535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.