ReviewBiomedicines2025
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Phenocopies: Classification, Key Features, and Differential Diagnosis.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Significance of the Echocardiographic Assessment of Longitudinal Left Ventricular Systolic Function in Children and Adolescents with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Echocardiographic Global Longitudinal Strain and Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Use of Disopyramide in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A European Insight.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- New Insights in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Autoantibody Profiling in Cardiomyopathies: Toward Immune-Guided Risk Stratification and Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Longitudinal Adipokine and Lipid Profiles in Fabry Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death with Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- MELAS Syndrome Presenting with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Advanced Heart Failure: A Multisystem Diagnostic Challenge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among cardiomyopathies, the hypertrophic phenotype is the most common, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) phenocopies represent a heterogeneous group of conditions. They are defined by a left ventricular wall thickness ≥15 mm in the absence of other causes such as loading conditions, ischemia, or valvular disease. Although they mimic similar clinical and morphological features, their etiologies are distinct and include genetic, metabolic, and infiltrative mechanisms. Therefore, accurate classification and differential diagnosis are crucial for effective management and treatment. Sarcomeric HCM is the most frequent form, accounting for up to 60% of cases. However, numerous non-sarcomeric phenocopies exist, including amyloidosis, Fabry disease, glycogen storage disorders, RASopathies, and mitochondrial diseases. Clinical and imaging findings are essential to distinguish these entities from sarcomeric HCM. Electrocardiography, echocardiography, advanced modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and specific laboratory tests all play a central role in guiding diagnosis. Genetic testing provides key insights into mutations and inheritance patterns, further supporting definitive diagnosis. Correct identification of an HCM phenocopy carries important therapeutic implications, as disease-specific treatments can significantly improve prognosis. For example, targeted therapies exist for amyloidosis, Fabry disease, and certain metabolic or mitochondrial disorders, underlining the clinical relevance of an accurate diagnosis. This review aims to provide an overview of HCM phenocopies and assist clinicians in diagnostic reasoning. The first part addresses classification according to pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical features, and genetic background. The second part focuses on the stepwise approach to differential diagnosis, integrating clinical assessment, laboratory evaluation, ECG, echocardiography, and CMR findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.