ReviewBiomedicines2025
Exosome-Derived microRNAs as Liquid-Biopsy Biomarkers in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review and Evidence Map.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- LUCAT1 promotes stemness in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by sponging miR-128.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Role of cancer-associated fibroblast-derived exosomes in pancreatic cancer: clinical therapeutic potential and targeting challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exosome-derived microRNAs (miRNAs) have been proposed as minimally invasive biomarkers for laryngeal squamous- cell carcinoma (LSCC). Because oral and maxillofacial surgeons are integral to head-and-neck oncologic and reconstructive pathways, such liquid-biopsy signals could support perioperative decision-making (selection for organ-preserving surgery), margin surveillance, and reconstructive planning. We conducted a preregistered, protocol-driven search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to 1 June 2025. Given the very small number of clinically comparable diagnostic studies, discordant index tests/thresholds, and high heterogeneity, we did not perform quantitative pooling or publication-bias testing. Instead, we undertook a narrative synthesis and constructed an evidence map; risk of bias tools (QUADAS-2; ROBINS-I) were applied descriptively to inform qualitative confidence. Nine studies were formally analysed based on eligibility to the study topic. Two serum-based case-control investigations (111 LSCC, 80 controls) reported areas under the ROC curve of 0.876 (miR-21 + HOTAIR) and 0.797 (miR-941), with corresponding sensitivities of 94% and 82%. Seven mechanistic papers showed that vesicular cargos-including miR-1246, circPVT1, and LINC02191-drive STAT3-dependent M2 polarisation, NOTCH1-mediated stemness, Rap1b-VEGFR2 angiogenesis, and glycolytic re-programming, producing 1.6-2.6-fold increases in invasion, tube formation, or xenograft growth. Only three studies fulfilled MISEV-2018 characterisation criteria, and none incorporated external validation. This narrative review and evidence map identifies promising but preliminary diagnostic signals and biologically plausible mechanisms for exosomal miRNAs in LSCC; however, the evidence is sparse, single-region, methodologically inconsistent, and at high risk of bias. Findings do not support clinical implementation at this stage. Priorities include harmonised EV workflows, prespecified thresholds, and prospective, multi-centre validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.