ReviewBiomedicines2025
A Review of Rodent Behavior, Mobility, and Pain Modifications in Response to Destabilization of the Medial Meniscus Injury.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, Radiological, and Biochemical Evaluation in Orthopedics: Lessons from a Special Issue.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Venlafaxine as Monotherapy and in Combination Regimens in Acute Rodent Nociception Experimental Models: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Biluo Qianyuan Formula Ameliorates Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis by Suppressing FN1-Mediated Synovial Inflammation and Restoring Joint Homeostasis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing emphasis is being placed on evaluating pain and mobility outcomes of osteoarthritis (OA) in both clinical and preclinical studies. In rodent models of post-traumatic OA (PTOA), particularly those utilizing destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM), behavioral assays are becoming more prominent as researchers seek to bridge the translational gap between structural joint pathology and human disability. However, substantial variability exists in how behavior, mobility, and pain are assessed, potentially limiting reproducibility and cross-study comparisons. This review evaluates the current literature on behavioral and pain-related outcomes in rodent DMM models, with the aim of cataloging observed phenotypes, identifying methodological inconsistencies, and proposing recommendations for standardization. We compiled data on a range of behavioral assays, including mechanical and thermal sensitivity, cage monitoring, gait analysis, weight distribution, balance, and joint compression, to construct a temporal framework of post-injury changes in behavior. Across studies, behavioral changes were observed as early as one day post-injury and persisted up to 30 weeks, with notable variability depending on age, sex, and testing protocols. Young male mice (≤12 weeks old) were the most extensively studied. The findings highlight clear trends in pain sensitivity and functional decline but also underscore the need for harmonized methodologies and reporting standards. By providing a comprehensive synthesis of behavioral outcomes post-DMM, this review aims to support more informed study design and interpretation, offering a foundation for greater consistency and translational relevance in future rodent DMM research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.