Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462860›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Strategies for the Molecular Classification of Medulloblastoma.

Josselen Carina Ramírez-Chiquito, Sergio Juárez-Méndez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Josselen Carina Ramírez-ChiquitoExperimental Oncology Laboratory, National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City 04530, Mexico.
Sergio Juárez-MéndezExperimental Oncology Laboratory, National Institute of Pediatrics, Mexico City 04530, Mexico.

Funding

E022 Program of the Instituto Nacional de Pediatría protocol 2022/003SECIHTI 272633 and CF-2023-G-1007SSA FPIS2024-INP-6405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifteen years ago, an omic study of medulloblastoma revealed the existence of four groups that are biologically and clinically different. Since then, various molecular classification methods have emerged, each with different diagnostic capabilities. Knowledge of these tools is essential for countries with low economic resources to be able to access the technology that is most within their reach since, at present, the precision of molecular classification is crucial for clinical practice, not only because of its relevance in the prognosis of patients but also because of its decisive impact on therapeutic strategies, which are essential for reducing mortality from this disease.

Indexed as

cerebellar neoplasmsmolecular biologymolecular diagnostic techniquesmolecular pathology

Identifiers

PMID41462860
PMCPMC12730644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.