ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Types and Diagnosis of Childhood Intellectual Disabilities: Advancing Accuracy for Better Outcomes.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Depression and Anxiety Risk in Children With Intellectual Developmental Disorder.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intellectual disability (ID)-termed intellectual developmental disorder in DSM-5-TR and disorders of intellectual development in ICD-11-is a heterogeneous spectrum of neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by impairments in general intellectual abilities and adaptive functioning, with onset during the developmental period. Precise and early recognition of ID can alter developmental trajectories by clarifying prognosis, guiding targeted genetic and medical investigations, initiating time-sensitive interventions, preventing diagnostic overshadowing, and informing educational planning and family counseling. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary diagnostic standards from DSM-5-TR and ICD-11, recent updates in epidemiology, and an aetiology-oriented framework for classifying "types" of intellectual disability. It further outlines current best practices in diagnostic work-up-including developmental surveillance and screening, standardized cognitive and adaptive assessments, genomic testing (microarray, exome/genome sequencing, and syndrome-specific assays), selective metabolic studies, and neuroimaging or EEG when indicated. Additionally, the review explores culturally responsive and equitable assessment, special diagnostic contexts (such as profound impairment, sensory and motor confounds, and bilingualism), and the frequent co-occurrence of other neurodevelopmental and medical disorders. The discussion concludes with practical, stepwise diagnostic pathways that clinicians can readily apply and anticipates emerging frontiers-such as genomic medicine and digital phenotyping-that promise to enhance diagnostic yield and clinical utility in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.