ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Experimental and Clinical Approaches to Preventing Aminoglycoside-Induced Ototoxicity: A Scoping Review.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Aminoglycosides remain indispensable in modern medicine but share a serious dose-limiting adverse effect: irreversible cochleovestibular ototoxicity. (2) This scoping review systematically maps experimental and clinical strategies aimed at preventing aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss, integrating mechanistic insights across preclinical and translational domains. (3) Preclinical evidence, encompassing in vitro and in vivo studies, delineates three principal mechanistic ways of protection: (A) antioxidant and redox modulation, including N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), vitamin C, edaravone, and selected phytochemicals, which counteract reactive oxygen species-mediated hair cell apoptosis; (B) mitochondrial stabilization with compounds such as mitoquinone, celastrol, and histone deacetylase inhibitors restoring bioenergetic and proteostatic balance; and (C) restriction of aminoglycoside entry through partial blockade of the mechano-electrical transduction channel, notably by ORC-13661 and related modulators. Additional strategies involve nitric oxide modulation, vasodilatory agents, and iron chelation. Efficacy, however, remains compound- and antibiotic-specific, with paradoxical effects observed for several drugs. Clinical evidence remains limited and methodologically diverse. Of the investigated pharmacologic interventions, aspirin provides the most robust and reproducible evidence of protection against gentamicin-induced hearing loss, whereas NAC demonstrates a consistent, but population-specific benefit among dialysis patients. In contrast, vitamin E-despite promising experimental findings-has failed to show clinically significant otoprotective effects in randomized human studies. (4) In conclusion, while experimental data establish a strong mechanistic basis for pharmacologic otoprotection, clinical studies remain few, underpowered, and methodologically inconsistent. Standardized, adequately powered, and mechanistically informed clinical trials are urgently needed to translate experimental promise into actionable otoprotective strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.