ArticleScientific reports2025
Oxygenation in acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease:a nationwide survey.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) may lead to acute respiratory failure with poor prognosis. Little is known about the optimal oxygenation strategy in this indication, in particular since the development of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO). Therefore, we conducted a nationwide survey among respiratory and intensive care unit (ICU) physicians to assess their real-life practices. Between January and June 2024, physicians were questioned, using an online survey (11 questions), regarding the non-invasive oxygenation strategy they used in the management of patients with AE-ILD: face mask (FM), HFNO, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV). The response rate was 119/270 (44.1%), including 59.5% of ICU and 40.5% of respiratory physicians.=.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.