ArticleScientific reports2025
A memory based model for cartilage and meniscus segmentation in 3D knee MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based segmentation and quantitative assessment of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Automated knee MRI segmentation with KneeSeg-U for cartilage and bone extraction using an unsupervised deep learning framework.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Structured MOAKS-based MRI features for predicting medial joint space narrowing progression: a comparative osteoarthritis initiative study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate morphometric assessment of cartilage-such as thickness and volume-via MRI is essential for monitoring knee osteoarthritis. However, segmenting cartilage remains challenging and dependent on extensive expert-annotated datasets, which are heavily subjected to inter-reader variability. Recent advancements in Visual Foundational Models (VFM), particularly memory-based approaches, offer opportunities for improving generalizability and robustness. In this study, we introduce SAMRI-2, a transformer-based deep learning method for cartilage and meniscus segmentation from 3D MRIs using interactive, memory-based VFMs. To improve spatial awareness and convergence, we incorporated a Hybrid Shuffling Strategy (HSS) during training and applied a segmentation mask propagation technique to enhance annotation efficiency. We evaluated SAMRI-2 against four AI models: two 3D convolutional architectures, namely the 3D-VNet and 3D nnU-Net, and two automatic transformer-based models, SAMRI2D and SAMRI3D. These models were trained on 575 3D knee MRI volumes from 270 distinct patients, using both public and internal datasets, and tested on 57 external cases with multi-radiologist annotations and diverse acquisition protocols. Model performance was assessed against reference standards using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Intersection over Union, with additional morphometric evaluations to further quantify segmentation accuracy. Our SAMRI-2 model, trained with HSS, outperformed all other models, achieving an average absolute improvement of 0.05 in DSC, with a maximum gain of 0.12 for tibial cartilage. It also demonstrated the lowest cartilage thickness errors, reducing discrepancies by up to threefold. Notably, SAMRI-2 maintained high performance with as few as three user clicks per volume, reducing annotation effort while ensuring anatomical precision. This memory-based VFM with spatial awareness offers a novel approach for reliable AI-assisted knee MRI segmentation, advancing deep learning in musculoskeletal imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.