Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462580›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Novel aminothiazole grafted cellulose composite for efficient removal of Hg(II) from wastewater in single and multicomponent systems.

Magda A Akl, Aya G Mostafa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Magda A AklDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 31556, Egypt. magdaakl@yahoo.com.
Aya G MostafaDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 31556, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pollution of mercury is a widespread and growing problem, as it poses significant environmental and health issues. Investigating adsorbents with high adsorption capacity is an urgent need to solve this issue. The current investigation introduces a novel aminothiazole Schiff base grafted cellulose (DAC@AHTT) adsorbent for Hg(II) removal from various water samples. The DAC@AHTT adsorbent was synthesized by the modification of dialdehyde cellulose (DAC) with 4-amino-5-hydrazinyl-4 H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol (AHTT) Schiff base. Moreover, the prepared DAC@AHTT adsorbent was characterized by physical, chemical, and morphological techniques, and its performance was systematically obtained. The maximum adsorption capacity of 495.7 mg.g− 1 was achieved at the optimum conditions of pH (6–8), a dose of 0.002 g, and 240 min. Hg(II) adsorption follows pseudo-2nd -order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm models, revealing the spontaneous, exothermic, and monolayer chemisorption. The DAC@AHTT material was successively employed for the Hg(II) removal from real water samples, with a recovery (Re, %) exceeding 98%. The DAC@AHTT adsorbent has a good recycling efficiency of 85% after three adsorption-desorption cycles. The adsorption mechanism of Hg(II) onto DAC@AHTT adsorbent has been elucidated, showing that N and S atoms are the main binding sites. The adsorbent was successfully employed for the adsorption of Hg(II), Ni(II), Pb(II), and Cu(II) in multicomponent systems by applying the Plackett-Burman design of experiments (PBD). These findings suggest that DAC@AHTT is a promising, efficient, and sustainable adsorbent for water treatment applications.

Indexed as

ANOVACelluloseHeavy metalsHg(II)Multicomponent studyPlackett–Burman design (PBD)Schiff baseWater treatment

Identifiers

PMID41462580
PMCPMC12753772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.