ArticleScientific reports2025
Metadata-driven identification of high-temperature superconductor candidates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent discovery of high-[Formula: see text] superconductivity in hydrogen-rich materials has driven significant progress in superconductor research, particularly in binary and ternary hydrides. However, more complex hydrogen-rich systems remain largely unexplored. Our analysis suggests that while quaternary hydrides adhere to key design principles identified in simpler systems, their distribution within the relevant chemical space is notably sparse, underscoring the need for targeted investigations. By applying stringent selection criteria based on hydrogen fraction, mass ratio, and electronegativity, we systematically reduce the initial database of 38,517,336 possible quaternary hydrides to 1,060,019 promising candidates, representing just 2.75% of the total compositional space. This focused approach enhances the efficiency of computational screening and experimental validation by prioritizing materials with the highest likelihood of exhibiting superconductivity. The results provide a well-defined framework for the discovery of next-generation superconductors, guiding both theoretical exploration and experimental synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.