Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462509›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A new automatic forecasting method based on explainable deep dendritic artificial neural network.

Eren Bas, Erol Egrioglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eren BasFaculty of Arts and Science, Department of Data Science and Analytics, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey.
Erol EgriogluFaculty of Arts and Science, Department of Data Science and Analytics, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey. erol.egrioglu@giresun.edu.tr.

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 122F133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forecasting practitioners need automated forecasting methods that do not involve subjective decisions. For this reason, in recent years, the literature has been trying to automate forecasting methods. Automated forecasting methods are usually based on various models or variable selection strategies and various hypothesis tests for data preprocessing. This study proposes input significance tests for model inputs of deep dendritic recurrent neural networks and model validity tests, in the context of explainability studies. The performance of the proposed tests is investigated with a simulation study. Secondly, based on the developed tests and some statistical tools, a new automatic forecasting method for deep dendritic recurrent neural networks is proposed. The forecasting ability of the proposed method is compared with other successful forecasting methods in the literature using M3 and M4 competition time series.

Indexed as

Automatic forecasting methodsDeep neural networksDifferential evolution algorithmForecastingRecurrent neural networks

Identifiers

PMID41462509
PMCPMC12748647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.