ArticleScientific reports2025
Motor unit behavior of lumbar multifidus during a forward trunk bending task performed under different speeds and loads in asymptomatic participants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deduction of Back Pain Patients Using EMG Technology and Inertial Sensors During Functional Tests.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background The lumbar multifidus (LM) plays a key role in static and dynamic stability; however, studies of LM motor unit behavior have yet to be extensively investigated. This study aimed to assess the test-retest reliability of motor unit behavior measurements using electromyography decomposition (dEMG) and to investigate the motor unit behavior under different speeds and loads in asymptomatic participants. Methods In this experimental repeated-measures design, 29 male and female asymptomatic participants were recruited. Motor unit behavior was measured during two sets of 60-second active trunk flexion exercises using dEMG under two speeds (15 and 25 repetitions/minute) and two loads (5% and 10% body weight). The action potential amplitude and motor unit firing rate were derived. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine within-session test-retest reliability, and a two-factor repeated-measure ANOVA was used to determine the effects of load and speed. Results Findings demonstrated acceptable within-session test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.70) for most parameters. Significantly greater peak and average amplitudes and average firing rates were seen with an increase in speed, while greater average amplitudes and firing rates were seen with an increase in load. Conclusion These findings support the use of measures of LM motor unit behavior. Exercises at greater speeds and loads increase LM firing rates and amplitudes. A better understanding of LM motor unit behavior may aid our understanding of rehabilitation protocols for low back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.