ArticleScientific reports2025
A study on factors influencing music enthusiast's behavioral intention to use generative AI for music composition based on an expanded technology acceptance model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological and social factors influencing AI painting tool adoption among young-old adults in the context of creative aging.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Can AI singing retain users? Examining how experience, ethical acceptance, and affective engagement shape continuance intention.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to understand the intentions of music enthusiasts in using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for music composition and to elucidate the factors influencing those intentions. A covariance-based structural equation modeling approach is applied to construct a technology acceptance model (TAM). A total of 429 valid questionnaire responses were analyzed to explore music enthusiasts' acceptance mechanisms regarding GenAI tools. The sample encompasses diverse age groups, educational backgrounds, and experience levels, thus ensuring the broad applicability of the findings. The results show that relationships within the original TAM structure remain robust. Specifically, perceived AI risk negatively impacts intention to use (IU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU); however, it does not correlate significantly with perceived usefulness (PU). Perceived trust positively influences PEOU and PU but does not directly affect IU. Content quality is positively correlated with PEOU, PU, and IU. Social influence is correlated only with PU and does not affect PEOU or IU. Perceived enjoyment enhances both PEOU and PU but has no effect on IU. Demographic analysis reveals no differences in GenAI tool evaluations among music enthusiasts in terms of gender, age, or education level. Overall, this report provides essential theoretical and practical insights for applying GenAI in music creation by integrating traditional and novel factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.