Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462425›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A study on factors influencing music enthusiast's behavioral intention to use generative AI for music composition based on an expanded technology acceptance model.

Yongxin Zhou, Yuhui Wang, Jiayu Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yongxin ZhouChina Conservatory of Music, Beijing, China.
Yuhui WangSchool of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha, China. yuhuiwang@csu.edu.cn.
Jiayu SuSchool of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha, China. sujiayu0224@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China 2412115803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to understand the intentions of music enthusiasts in using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for music composition and to elucidate the factors influencing those intentions. A covariance-based structural equation modeling approach is applied to construct a technology acceptance model (TAM). A total of 429 valid questionnaire responses were analyzed to explore music enthusiasts' acceptance mechanisms regarding GenAI tools. The sample encompasses diverse age groups, educational backgrounds, and experience levels, thus ensuring the broad applicability of the findings. The results show that relationships within the original TAM structure remain robust. Specifically, perceived AI risk negatively impacts intention to use (IU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU); however, it does not correlate significantly with perceived usefulness (PU). Perceived trust positively influences PEOU and PU but does not directly affect IU. Content quality is positively correlated with PEOU, PU, and IU. Social influence is correlated only with PU and does not affect PEOU or IU. Perceived enjoyment enhances both PEOU and PU but has no effect on IU. Demographic analysis reveals no differences in GenAI tool evaluations among music enthusiasts in terms of gender, age, or education level. Overall, this report provides essential theoretical and practical insights for applying GenAI in music creation by integrating traditional and novel factors.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIntentionMusicAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultGenerative artificial intelligenceIntension to useMusic compositionMusic enthusiastTechnology acceptance model

Identifiers

PMID41462425
PMCPMC12749033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.