Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462400›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025

Patient directed social media use among participants of centering pregnancy groups.

Alison M El Ayadi, Nadia G Diamond-Smith, Mia Schuman, Laura Weil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison M El AyadiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. alison.elayadi@ucsf.edu.
Nadia G Diamond-SmithDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mia SchumanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Laura WeilDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial support in pregnancy and postpartum is important for optimizing maternal and infant health. Group prenatal care offers the opportunity for in-person social support yet does not extend into the postpartum period. Mobile social support models may further meet the needs of pregnant individuals and partners during pregnancy and into the postpartum period. However, the use and utility of mobile social support for pregnant people and their partners in the context of group prenatal care and beyond has not been studied. Assessing Centering patients' utilization of existing social media platforms can inform programmatic development.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study among recent participants of UCSF's Centering Pregnancy

resultsParticipants gave birth between 2018 and 2021 (68%), were college-educated (97.3%), and regularly accessed social media (> 75% across platforms). Most participants engaged in Centering Pregnancy DISCUSSION: The findings confirm the importance of social support, especially postpartum, for health, how mobile support groups can impact these outcomes, and needs and areas of improvement for group prenatal care. Integration of a social media support component to the evolving post-COVID Centering Pregnancy

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareSocial MediaSocial SupportAdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAntepartum careGroup prenatal care/Centering Pregnancy®Health informaticsMental healthPatient educationPostpartum care

Identifiers

PMID41462400
PMCPMC12751661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.