Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462389›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Enhancing employee creativity with enterprise social media: a psychological insights approach.

Wenxuan DU, Abdul Hameed Pitafi, Sobia Asher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenxuan DUFaculty of Business, Accounting & Finance, MAHSA University, Jenjarom, Selangor, 42610, Malaysia.
Abdul Hameed PitafiDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan. hameedpitafi@hotmail.com.
Sobia AsherDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterprise social media (ESM) represents an emerging technological tool that may assist employees in navigating workplace uncertainties. The present study investigates the relationship between ESM affordances and individual creativity, framed within the context of affordance theory. The research develops a model that elucidates how four key ESM affordances—visibility, association, editability, and persistence—affect creativity through three psychological conditions: psychological meaningfulness, availability, and safety. Utilizing primary data collected from 391 participants (226 male, 165 female) who engage with ESM in their professional environments. Specifically, the outcomes illustrated that visibility and association affordance are positively connected to psychological meaningfulness and availability, but have no relation with psychological safety. Affordance of Persistence is significantly related to psychological safety, and has an insignificant relation with psychological meaningfulness, and availability. Affordance of editability is significantly related to psychological meaningfulness, meaningfulness, availability, and psychological safety. Furthermore, results indicate that psychological meaningfulness, availability, and psychological safety have a significant influence on worker creativity. The current study advances the prior ESM literature by exploring the causes and implications of employee psychological states in the contexts of ESM and creativity.

Indexed as

CreativityEmploymentSocial MediaWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychological SafetyYoung AdultEmployee creativityESM affordanceESM usagePsychological conditionsWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID41462389
PMCPMC12751818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.