Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462358›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using different sweep velocity in the treatment of refractory glaucoma.

Anuwat Jiravarnsirikul, Natticha Jiamjira-Anon, Ngamkae Ruangvaravate, Darin Sakiyalak, Naris Kitnarong, Theerajate Phongsuphan, Wasawat Sermsripong, Sakaorat Petchyim

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anuwat JiravarnsirikulDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Natticha Jiamjira-AnonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Ngamkae RuangvaravateDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Darin SakiyalakDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Naris KitnarongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Theerajate PhongsuphanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Wasawat SermsripongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Sakaorat PetchyimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Siriraj, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. sakaoratpoy012@gmail.com.

Funding

Siriraj research development fund Grant Number R016631049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy and safety of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) using different sweep velocities in refractory glaucoma. Twenty-eight eyes of 28 patients were treated with a slow-sweep protocol (20 s × 4 sweeps per hemisphere, fluence = 104.8 J/cm

Indexed as

Ciliary BodyGlaucomaLaser CoagulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedScleraTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityIntraocular pressureMicropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulationRefractory glaucomaSweep velocity

Identifiers

PMID41462358
PMCPMC12748536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.