ArticleHuman genomics2025
Distinct pathogenic mechanisms underlying two protein C variants (p.Arg211Gln and p.Val367Met) in a thrombophilic family: integrated functional and structural analyses.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHereditary protein C deficiency (PCD) increases thrombotic risk, but the molecular mechanisms of distinct missense variants remain incompletely defined. Two siblings from a family with recurrent deep vein thrombosis and a strong family history of thrombotic events were found to carry compound heterozygous PROC variants.
objectivesTo elucidate the biosynthetic and functional consequences of two PROC missense variants, c.632G > A (p.Arg211Gln) and c.1099G > A (p.Val367Met), and their combined impact on anticoagulant capacity.
methodsTwo siblings with recurrent deep vein thrombosis were analyzed. Family segregation analysis was performed on multiple heterozygous carriers to support genotype-phenotype correlations. Recombinant protein C variants were expressed in HEK293T cells to assess expression efficiency and intracellular accumulation. Zymogen activation by thrombin-thrombomodulin and APC anticoagulant activity were evaluated using FVa degradation, clotting, and thrombin generation assays. Structural modeling and Na⁺-dependent enzymatic assays were performed to explore variant-specific mechanistic defects.
resultsBoth variants exhibited partial expression defects, with p.Val367Met showing significantly increased intracellular accumulation and reduced secretion efficiency. p.Arg211Gln selectively impaired zymogen activation without affecting APC function (type IIa deficiency), whereas p.Val367Met preserved activation but reduced Na⁺-dependent catalytic efficiency (type IIb deficiency). Structural modeling revealed that Arg211 substitution disrupts activation peptide conformation, while Val367Met perturbs the Na⁺-binding loop adjacent to the S1 pocket. Co-inheritance of both resulted in synergistic anticoagulant impairment, leading to markedly elevated thrombin generation.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that PCD pathophysiology can arise from combined biosynthetic and functional defects, with distinct structural perturbations differentially affecting zymogen processing and protease activity. Integrated genetic, biochemical, and structural analyses, in the context of family history and clinical phenotype, are essential for accurate variant interpretation. Understanding the specific molecular mechanisms of PROC variants can inform clinical decision-making, guide personalized anticoagulant therapy, and help prevent thrombotic events in affected individuals. Therapeutic strategies targeting zymogen activation or proteostasis may offer potential avenues to mitigate thrombotic risk in hereditary PCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.