ArticlePlant methods2025
Integrating microbiome and machine learning for precision diagnosis of rice bakanae disease.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bakanae is a fungal rice disease that is threatening global rice production, causing severe yield losses. The plant microbiome plays a significant role in plant stress resistance, but its high-dimensional characteristics have not been fully exploited. Therefore, we integrated the microbiome and machine learning (ML) to diagnose bakanae disease in this study. We found significant correlations between Gammaproteobacteria and Bacteroidia and the severity of bakanae disease. We constructed different diagnosis models based on random forests (RF), support vector machines (SVM), and convolutional neural networks (CNN) on 88 biological replicates with an independent test set. We found that the RF model demonstrated strong performance across four taxonomic levels, with an accuracy of 88.9% and an F1 score of 94.1%. Notably, a Bray-Curtis dissimilarity-based extraction method was proposed to rapidly screen practical information from the original microbial community, which can enhance the model performance to a certain extent. According to phenotypic data, the disease severity of infected samples was classified into two levels (high and low infected levels) using the K-means clustering method. In the diagnosis of infection severity based on the family level, the model's prediction accuracy reached 77.8%. Collectively, these findings highlight that the combination of microbiome with ML can advance diagnostic strategies for bakanae disease, providing new avenues for precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.