Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462325›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Effect of different factors on predicting patient mortality beyond the NACA classification: a multivariate analysis of more than 2,000 polytrauma patients.

Isabel Scala, Martin Riegger, Alessandro Bensa, Andrea Stefano Monteleone, Paolo Ivan Fiore, Christian Candrian, Giuseppe Filardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabel ScalaFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland. isabel.scala@usi.ch.
Martin RieggerFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-2625
Alessandro BensaFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1021-063X
Andrea Stefano MonteleoneService of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2853-1896
Paolo Ivan FioreService of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2780-234X
Christian CandrianFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3543-981X
Giuseppe FilardoFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8136-0977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score is widely used to assess polytrauma patients. NACA scores of 4 and 5 indicate severe and potentially life-threatening injuries. However, these two categories are rather broad, with a large variety of conditions within each level. Aim of this study was to investigate a large cohort of NACA 4 and NACA 5 trauma patients and quantify the impact of individual factors on the mortality risk.

methodsThe polytrauma registry of the Lugano Regional Hospital affiliated to the National Swiss Trauma Registry (STR) was retrospectively analysed to investigate all patients admitted between 2015 and 2023 with a NACA score of 4 or 5. Out of 2,152 patients, 1,684 were NACA 4 and 468 were classified as NACA 5. Extracted parameters included age, mechanism of injury, NACA score, prehospital variables and hospital variables, and patient diagnoses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all patients combined and separately for NACA 4 and NACA 5 subgroups.

resultsA total of 121 patients died during hospitalization. The multivariate analysis of the prehospital variables showed that NACA score (OR 2.96), age (OR 1.11), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (OR 0.78), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR 7.22), and administration of vasoactive drugs (OR 2.38) were statistically significant independent risk factors for all included patients (p < 0.05). In the NACA 4 subgroup analysis only age (OR 1.13) and GCS (OR 0.69) emerged as statistically significant predictors of mortality (p < 0.05). In the NACA 5 subgroup, age (OR 1.09), GCS (OR 0.28), and administration of vasoactive drugs (OR 2.40) emerged as statistically significant predictors of mortality (p < 0.05).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that different factors can influence the mortality risk of polytrauma patients beyond the mere NACA 4 and 5 classification, including CPR, administration of vasoactive drugs, GCS, and age. These findings highlight the association between specific clinical parameters and the mortality risk, whose early identification is paramount for a more targeted management of polytrauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (LOE): III.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaRegistriesAdultAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSwitzerlandEmergency medicineGCSISSNACA scorePolytraumaRegistry

Identifiers

PMID41462325
PMCPMC12751856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.