ArticleTrials2025
Lobectomy-first versus lymphadenectomy-first on long-term survival for operable non-small cell lung cancer: protocol of LOFTY trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06577792 (Lobectomy-First Versus Lymphadenectomy-First Surgical Approach on Long-Term Survival in Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lobectomy-First Versus Lymphadenectomy-First Surgical Approach on Long-Term Survival in Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe standard surgical treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involves anatomical lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND). According to the principle of "from distal to proximal" during tumour resection, MLND should ideally be performed before lobectomy to fit the criteria of surgical oncology. However, no prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) has compared MLND-first versus lobectomy-first approaches in early-stage NSCLC. This provides the rationale for this multicentre RCT.
methodsThis multicentre, prospective, open-label, RCT investigates the superiority of MLND-first over lobectomy-first in terms of long-term survival in patients with clinical stage T1-2N0-1M0 (stages I-II) NSCLC (LOFTY study). We plan to enrol 620 patients from multiple institutions. Stratified block randomisation will be performed in this trial. The primary endpoint is the 5-year disease-free survival rate, and the secondary endpoints comprise the 5-year overall survival rate and short-term outcomes, such as conversion rate, perioperative complication rate, number of resected mediastinal lymph nodes, operative death rate, postoperative hospital stays, R0 rate, operative time, chest tube duration, number of circulating tumour cells before and after operation, and the total cost of hospitalisation. The primary endpoint will be assessed by a central committee of blinded expert radiologists. Patient recruitment is currently ongoing. DISCUSSION: This multicentre, prospective, open-label RCT investigates whether MLND-first is superior to lobectomy-first in terms of long-term outcomes in early-stage NSCLC patients who are suitable for lobectomies. The results of this trial will provide high-level evidence to clarify the standard surgical sequence for early-stage operable NSCLC.
trial registrationGuangdong Association Study of Thoracic Oncology GASTO-10129. Registered on 26 March. 2022. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2300068586. Registered on 24 February 2023. CLINICALTRIAL: gov NCT06577792. Registered on 29 August 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.