ArticleScientific reports2025
Estimation of walking energy expenditure using a single sacrum-mounted IMU based on biomechanically-informed machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physics-informed hierarchical transformer for wearable sensor-based gait fatigue assessment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Energy expenditure (EE) estimation during walking has significant applications in healthcare, sports science, and rehabilitation, but remains challenging to measure in real-world settings. Existing wearable approaches often require complex multi-sensor systems or extensive training datasets, limiting their practical implementation. We propose a biomechanically-informed machine learning approach to estimate EE during walking in healthy subjects, based on sagittal joint powers of the body segment, derived from a single sacrum-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU). Segmental analysis confirmed that the stance-leg joint mechanical power exhibits the strong correlation with whole-body EE. Scaling relationships between efficiency-weighted segmental joint mechanical power and whole-body EE were first established by regression analysis. Segmental analysis revealed that sagittal-plane joint mechanical power of the body segment, particularly the stance leg strongly correlates with whole-body joint mechanical power (R > 0.9 across subjects and walking speeds). Leveraging this relationship and a lightweight artificial neural network that predicts segmental joint dynamics from an IMU data, the whole-body EE was estimated from the stance-leg sagittal power with efficiency coefficients and the regression-based scale factor. The approach was validated in 13 healthy adults walking at multiple speeds on a treadmill, with ground-truth EE measured via indirect calorimetry. The results demonstrated remarkable consistency both within individuals across speeds and across different subjects (coefficient of variation < 2%), suggesting a robust biomechanical linkage. Furthermore, joint dynamics of the stance leg were accurately estimated from single sacrum-mounted IMU data incorporating a single-leg stance partition and gait speed information. The resulting stance-leg power estimates enabled accurate EE estimation (RMSE 0.69 W/kg) across an independent cohort. This study demonstrates that sagittal-plane joint mechanical power of the body segment particularly the stance leg serves as a reliable biomechanical surrogate for whole-body EE during walking, which can be robustly inferred through the efficiency-weighting and regression-scaling. The proposed method offers a simple and practical solution for wearable EE monitoring, with potential applications in clinical rehabilitation, exercise prescription, and daily health tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.