ArticleBMC medical education2025
Effectiveness evaluation of standardized patient training system on emergency department residents in disposing patients with acute chest pain.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid triage and effective treatment of patients with acute chest pain are critical. Enhancing the clinical competency of emergency resident physicians in managing these patients has emerged as a key challenge in contemporary clinical education.
methodsEmergency department resident physicians were divided into two groups in 2022-2023. After receiving either traditional lecture-based training or standardized patient (SP) training, we assessed whether there was an improvement in the physicians' clinical competency in managing chest pain patients, and whether the time-to-treatment was reduced.
resultsFollowing SP training, resident physicians showed statistically significant improvements in physical exam (p = 0.036), management and treatment (p = 0.002), and total scores (p = 0.016). However, no significant differences were observed in history-talking (p = 0.941), differential diagnosis (p = 0.336), laboratory test (p = 0.523) and diagnosis (p = 0.131). Furthermore, the time required for residents to complete point-of-care testing (POCT) cardiac troponin I (cTnI), establish final diagnosis, and activate the catheterization laboratory was significantly reduced.
conclusionFollowing SP training, resident physicians improved their abilities in physical examination, management and treatment of patients with acute chest pain, and less time was spend compared to the physicians without SP training. The use of SP and the generalization of this training technique is recommended, particularly in resident physicians in emergency department where more timely treatment of patients is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.