Trial reportBMC health services research2025
Benefit of adding Cureety Techcare telemonitoring to usual care during injectable anticancer treatment: the OPTIMACURE multicentric French prospective randomized study.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06371911 (Benefit of Adding Cureety TechCare Telemonitoring to Usual Care During Injectable Anticancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Benefit of Adding Cureety TechCare Telemonitoring to Usual Care During Injectable Anticancer Treatment: a Multicentric French Prospective Randomized Study: The OPTIMACURE Protocol
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn routine oncology care, assessing a patient’s suitability for injectable anticancer treatment involves several factors including blood tests and follow-up calls from hospital staff to review results and relevant factors. The OPTIMA program at the François Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center and the “Star” program at Foch Hospital in France have improved chemotherapy prescription accuracy and reduced wait times through structured calls and biological tests. However, these programs rely heavily on telephone calls, increasing staff workload. The Cureety digital telemonitoring platform could streamline this process by efficiently collecting and evaluating patient data, potentially reducing the number of outgoing calls. The OPTIMACURE study was implemented to assess whether integrating Cureety telemonitoring into usual care can decrease the workload on hospital staff compared to programs like OPTIMA.
methodsThe main aim of this prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study is to assess the effectiveness of adding Cureety telemonitoring to usual care to reduce the number of outgoing telephone calls from the center during the first two months after randomization. Patients initiating injectable anticancer treatment will be randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to either usual care with Cureety telemonitoring or usual care alone (OPTIMA or equivalent program). Randomization will be stratified by treatment type, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, administration frequency, and participating center. A total of 192 patients will be recruited over four months, with patient participation planned for two months, making the study duration six months from the first enrollment. An interim analysis is planned once 96 patients reach the two-month visit. DISCUSSION: This study aims to validate telemonitoring as a more efficient alternative, potentially enhancing data collection and patient monitoring while reducing healthcare staff workload. The research aims to improve oncology care efficiency by integrating Cureety telemonitoring, reducing staff workload and improving patient care. It seeks to enhance the patient’s experience with timely data collection, leading to better quality of life, fewer emergency room visits, and potentially improved clinical outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06371911, registered on April, 15, 2024. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 2.1 dated from April, 16, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.