ArticleScientific reports2025
Distinct kinematics and micromorphology for symmetrical rowing and sliding on water in ripple bugs and water striders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semiaquatic bugs evolved two different propulsion mechanisms for their symmetrical rowing: a drag-based propulsion in Veliidae and a surface-tension-based propulsion in Gerridae. However, the comparative leg micromorphology and kinematics underlying these two mechanisms remain underexplored. In this study, we compared leg micro- and nanostructures and kinematics of Rhagovelia distincta (Veliidae), which employs midleg fans as oar-like blades for drag-based thrust, with Gerris latiabdominis (Gerridae), which uses long midlegs for surface-tension-based thrust. R. distincta move their midlegs in short strokes and deployed fans which function as "leaky paddles" with higher anteroposterior rigidity, inferred from seta and setula structure, exploiting drag and potentially lift. Fan protraction into the water appeared to require muscle control, while elastocapillarity may contribute to fan shaping. In contrast, G. latiabdominis exhibited longer strokes with midlegs covered with dense hydrophobic hairs suited for surface-tension-based propulsion. Ventral setae on tarsal section producing surface-tension-based-thrust formed longitudinal rows-and-gaps in both species, with posterior rows particularly robust and nano-grooved in G. latiabdominis. Additionally, both formed ventral beam-like structures from overlapping flat-tipped setae on hindlegs and forelegs which are used for support and sliding. These findings generate new hypotheses for refining models of locomotion on water surface by insects with their micro/nano-morphological diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.