Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462224›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Residents' perspectives on a resident-centered neighborhood approach to support health: a qualitative study.

Anniek Bosdijk, Anna Petra Nieboer, Jane Murray Cramm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anniek BosdijkDepartment of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. bosdijk@eshpm.eur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6395-861X
Anna Petra NieboerDepartment of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9676-0607
Jane Murray CrammDepartment of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-3207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpportunities to improve individuals' health and reduce health inequalities are increasingly being sought at the community and neighborhood levels. Neighborhood features can be of great importance, especially for the health of residents in vulnerable circumstances. However, little attention has been paid to their perspectives. This qualitative study was conducted to explore the views of these residents on how their neighborhoods can support their health needs.

methodsInterviews (January-March 2024) structured by eight dimensions of resident-centered neighborhood approaches were conducted with 15 residents in vulnerable circumstances (ages 44-85) of three neighborhoods in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The participants' views were analyzed thematically.

resultsThe interviewees considered physical, mental, and social aspects, including physical activity, having a positive outlook on life, social contact, and independence, to be important for their health.

conclusionsThe insights obtained in this study are crucial for the development of effective neighborhood initiatives that align with the needs and preferences of residents in vulnerable circumstances, ultimately contributing to their health and overall well-being.

Indexed as

Neighborhood CharacteristicsResidence CharacteristicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsQualitative ResearchHealth promotion and preventionResident-centered neighborhood approachResidents in vulnerable circumstancesThe Netherlands

Identifiers

PMID41462224
PMCPMC12822294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.