ArticleBMC nursing2025
Impact of resilience and wellbeing program in nursing: an integrative review.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Paradox of Performativity: Latent Depression as a Crisis in the Contemporary Psychosocial Context.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- The Effect of Compassion Satisfaction on Happiness at Work Among Nurses: Its Role as Mediator of Employee Well-Being.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInitiatives to support nurses’ wellbeing and resilience aim to maintain their mental and emotional health amid workplace challenges. These programs foster positive emotions, which are key to building resilience. While some view coping ability as innate, others regard resilience as a skill that can be developed.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the impact of nurses’ resilience and wellbeing programs in different contexts and how they affect patient’s care and organizational operations.
methodsOnline English articles published on PsycINFO, Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and ProQuest only included using the Whittemore & Knafl, 2005 framework from January 2005 to January 2020 were used to write and complete this study. Relevant data were extracted using a structured approach to ensure consistency and accuracy across studies. Additionally, the quality of each included study was assessed using established PRISMA appraisal tools to evaluate methodological rigor and minimize the risk of bias.
resultsThe literature review included 19 articles; of which 3 were mixed-method studies, 14 were quantitative studies, and two were qualitative studies. This review classified the 19 articles into three themes on impact: (1) Impact on nurses, (2) impact on patients’ care, and (3) impact on organizations and work environment.
conclusionsTo ensure the success of resilience and wellbeing interventions, overall, leaders should adopt an organizational approach. Programs should combine resilience and wellbeing with healthcare institutions’ overall wellbeing plans as part of a comprehensive staff support approach. These programs should be evaluated in a different cultural context to assess the impact and the effect on a short and long team on the nurse’s wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.