Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462199›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Health professions education and unprofessional behaviour in the global south: a scoping review of conceptions, theoretical frameworks, and prevalence.

Lunelle Pienaar, Desmond Kuupiel, Jacqueline van Wyk

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lunelle PienaarDepartment of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935, South Africa. lunelle.pienaar@uct.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-2717
Desmond KuupielDiscipline of Public Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4001, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7780-1955
Jacqueline van WykDepartment of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1894-7326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding how unprofessionalism is interpreted and enacted in low- and middle-income countries is essential for developing health professionals that are contextually and socially grounded. The scoping review explores and maps existing scientific evidence on unprofessional behaviour in health professions education from a Global South perspective. The review was informed by the research question: How is unprofessional behaviour defined, conceptualised, and framed theoretically in health professions education within the Global South?

methodsUsing a scoping review, we retrieved 382 articles, of which 14 articles were published between 2004 and 2024. The articles were retrieved across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost (Academic Search Complete, Health Source, and PsycINFO) databases, and supplemented by Google Scholar.

resultsThe studies emerged from 10 countries, with the majority conducted in the United Arab Emirates (21.4%), followed by Saudi Arabia and Thailand with 14.3% each, and other countries each contributing 7.1% of the total studies. The highest number of studies was published in 2017, 2020, and 2023 (14.3% each). Most study designs were cross-sectional (71.5%), while qualitative studies accounted for 21.4%, and mixed methods were 7.1%. The study populations predominantly consisted of medical students (64.4%), followed by residents (14.3%), and smaller groups including multi-disciplinary students (Medicine, Pharmacy, Nursing), clinicians and medical students, and clinical faculty members and medical students with 7.1% each. The studies were conducted across academic and clinical settings (50.0%), with others focusing solely on clinical environments (28.6%), preclinical settings (14.3%), and a clinical and surgical training environment (7.1%). Five key themes emerged: Academic Dishonesty and Integrity Violations, Bullying and Harassment, Clinical and Ethical Misconduct, Disrespect and Power Abuse, and Neglect of Professional Responsibilities.

conclusionsThe study findings draw attention to the need for theoretical engagement and institutional reforms that reflect the realities of educational and clinical training environments in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsHealth PersonnelProfessional MisconductDeveloping CountriesHumansAcademic dishonestyBullying and harassmentClinical and ethical misconductDisrespect and power abuseGlobal southLow- and Middle-Income countries (LMICs)Neglect of professional responsibilitiesProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID41462199
PMCPMC12751322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.