ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Reasons for unplanned hospitalisation in specialist community palliative care: a scoping review.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextMany individuals receiving specialist community palliative care experience unplanned hospitalisations or emergency department presentations. Understanding the reasons for this is essential to developing person-centred solutions.
objectivesTo identify the reasons for unplanned hospitalisations among people receiving specialist community palliative care.
methodsA PROSPERO (CRD42024495016) registered scoping review reported according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. A search of CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was undertaken for studies published from 2014 to 2025. Two reviewers completed title, abstract and full text screening and data extraction. Extracted reasons for hospitalisation were inductively coded using a content analysis approach, allowing for a descriptive summary of findings.
resultsThirteen of the 2482 studies identified met the inclusion criteria. Six categories of hospitalisation reason were generated: (1) unrelieved symptoms (16 subcategories), (2) acute event (five subcategories) (3) signs of deterioration, (4) patient or carer distress/fatigue, (5) misunderstanding of the goals of care and (6) other/unknown. Of the sub-categories, dyspnoea (n = 11 studies, 85%), pain (n = 9, 69%), gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 9, 69%) and infection (n = 7, 54%) were the most frequently reported reasons for hospitalisation. Comparative studies (n = 5) of specialist versus usual or no palliative care showed mixed hospitalisation outcomes, with limited statistical detail.
conclusionThis scoping review provides insight into patterns of hospitalisation, despite variability in data collection methods. This approach provides a foundation for developing targeted service improvements aimed at supporting individuals to stay at home for more extended periods in the last year of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.