ArticleBMC public health2025
Cardiovascular disease knowledge, risk perception, and lifestyle behaviors among university students in North-Central Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Risk Awareness Among Adults in the Northern Border Region of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study with Emphasis on Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality in Nigeria, with risk trajectories often established in early adulthood. While university students are a key population for prevention, a critical gap exists in understanding how their knowledge of CVD translates into personal risk perception and lifestyle intentions in the Nigerian context. This study investigated this nexus among students in North-Central Nigeria.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 1,300 undergraduates from two universities using the validated ABCD Risk Questionnaire. The survey measured CVD knowledge (0-8 scale), perceived risk (8-32 scale), and behavioral intentions for exercise and diet. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, Pearson correlations, and multiple regression (α = 0.05).
resultsParticipants demonstrated moderate CVD knowledge (Mean = 6.21 ± 1.32 out of 8, 77.6% correct) yet exhibited significant gaps in understanding familial risk (56.9% correct) and alcohol's role (72.8% correct). A striking inverse relationship emerged: higher knowledge was significantly correlated with lower personal risk perception (r=-0.187, p < 0.001). Overall risk perception was low (Mean = 18.75 ± 4.88 out of 32, 58.6% of scale maximum), with 72.1% dismissing the likelihood of future CVD events. Paradoxically, this low-risk perception coexisted with high readiness for behavioral change, as 78.1% demonstrated high exercise readiness (Mean = 2.11 ± 0.64 on 1-4 scale, where lower scores indicate higher readiness) and 79.9% high dietary readiness (Mean = 2.27 ± 0.73). Self-reported smoking prevalence was 2.2% and alcohol use 3.6%. NSUK students reported slightly higher perceived risk than UNIJOS students (19.12 ± 4.95 vs. 18.43 ± 4.82, p = 0.012, Cohen's d = 0.14), though knowledge and behavioral intentions were comparable between universities.
conclusionsWe identify a "knowledge-risk paradox" among Nigerian university students: greater knowledge is inversely correlated with lower personal risk perception (r=-0.187, p < 0.001), an association suggesting potent optimistic bias. This disconnect indicates that conventional knowledge-based health education is likely insufficient. Public health interventions must pivot towards strategies that include personalized risk assessment to combat complacency and effectively channel the high pre-existing readiness for healthy lifestyle changes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.