ArticleScientific reports2025
Less-invasive age estimation using hair based on DNA methylation in brown bears.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Information on chronological age is essential for exploring the life history, conservation, and management of wildlife. Recently, DNA methylation-based methods using blood or skin have been established as alternatives to the traditional tooth-based method in bear species. However, the collection of these tissues is limited to captured or dead individuals. In the present study, we established the first hair-based age estimation model based on DNA methylation levels in brown bears, aiming for future application to less-invasively obtained hair of wild individuals. We performed bisulfite pyrosequencing and measured the methylation levels of hair root DNA. The methylation levels of cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites adjacent to the genes VGF, KCNK12, and ELOVL2 were found to be correlated with age. The best age estimation model used three cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites adjacent to two genes, VGF and KCNK12, with a mean absolute error of 3.2 years and median absolute error of 2.2 years after leave-one-out cross-validation. Our method is innovative because of the simplicity of sampling and the lack of requirement to capture bears. If this method can be widely applied to hair samples obtained in the field, the age structure of wild populations can be understood, contributing to ecological research, conservation, and management of bear species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.