Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462140›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

The impact of artificial intelligence on the prescribing, selection, resistance, and stewardship of antimicrobials: a scoping review.

Nadia Al Mazrouei, Asim Ahmed Elnour, Safaa Badi, Fahad T Alsulami, Ali Awadallah Mohamed Saeed, Khalid Awad Al-Kubaisi, Vineetha Menon, Israa Yousif Khidir, Marwan Ismail, Maha Mahagoub Osman Mahagoub and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nadia Al MazroueiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutic, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah City, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-9730
Asim Ahmed ElnourProgram of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi Campus, Abu Dhabi City, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-7810
Safaa BadiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Omdurman Islamic University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-983X
Fahad T AlsulamiClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-7958
Ali Awadallah Mohamed SaeedDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Clinical and Industrial Pharmacy, National University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-4825
Khalid Awad Al-KubaisiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy-University of Sharjah, Sharjah City, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4260-1117
Vineetha MenonDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman City, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-0962
Israa Yousif KhidirDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacy Practice, (PhD, MSc, B Pharm), College of Pharmacy, Najran University institution, Najran City, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8674-3603
Marwan IsmailDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Gulf Medical University (GMU), Ajman, 4184, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5692-1632
Maha Mahagoub Osman MahagoubFaculty of Medicine, Microbiology Department, Ibnsina University, Khartoum City, Sudan. assahura2031@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7208-1511
Aruna Kumari RamisettiEMS Program, Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT), Al Ain City, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1539-3372
Rand ElkaribPharmacy Diploma Program, Higher Colleges of Technology (HCT), Al Ain City, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0898-6257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial selection, prescribing, and resistance are global health issues resulting from the overuse and misuse of antimicrobials in the healthcare and agricultural sectors. It raises healthcare costs, prolongs diseases, and escalates mortality.

objectiveThe current study objective was to specifically explore how Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning affect the selection of antimicrobials, address antimicrobial resistance, and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programs through a structured scoping review. The aim was to clarify what direct impacts AI/ML have in these areas and how they contribute to improvements and challenges in practice.

methodA literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL. A detailed search approach was developed to guarantee that all relevant studies were included. The entire electronic search strategy included terms such as “Artificial intelligence-AI,” “digital health,” “selection/prescribing of antimicrobials, “antimicrobial stewardship-AMS, “antimicrobial resistance-AMR, “Machine Learning-ML”, and “telemedicine,”.

resultsA critical appraisal of sources of evidence from the included studies was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form. For this review, 70 sources related to artificial intelligence’s impact on antimicrobial selection/prescribing, resistance, and stewardship were initially screened. Of these, 33 were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 16 studies included in the review. Seventeen were excluded for lack of direct information relevant to AI’s effect on antimicrobial prescribing, resistance, and stewardship. This scoping review summarizes how artificial intelligence improves the accuracy of therapy selection, helps reduce inappropriate prescriptions by predicting necessity, and aids clinical decision-making (CDSS). It also details specific barriers, such as integration challenges, and facilitators like improved workflow, to incorporating artificial intelligence technologies in real-world clinical settings.

conclusionThe reviewed studies showed that Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning improve selection, prescribing, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial stewardship. The use of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning models in selection, prescribing, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial stewardship has a profound impact on clinical outcomes. The utilization of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning enhances prescription accuracy in AMS programs. The use of Machine Learning optimizes antimicrobial selection and predicts resistance. Future research should examine the implementation of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and AI-CDSS over a more extended period to understand its long-term effects on professional practices and organizational structures.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipArtificial IntelligenceDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug PrescriptionsHumansMachine LearningAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial resistance (AMR)Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)Artificial intelligence (AI)Digital healthMachine learning (ML)Selection/prescribing of antimicrobials and telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41462140
PMCPMC12859941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.