ArticleBMC nephrology2025
The diagnostic value of uromodulin protein measurement in autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease due to uromodulin mutation (ADTKD-UMOD): serum or urine?
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease caused by uromodulin mutation (ADTKD-UMOD) is a hereditary condition characterized by progressive renal dysfunction, often requiring renal replacement therapy by middle age. A notable feature is a strong family history of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hyperuricemia; however, the absence of urinary abnormalities often delays diagnosis. To facilitate early CKD management, a diagnostic method that is simpler than genetic analysis yet strongly indicative of ADTKD-UMOD is needed.
methodsSerum and urinary UMOD levels were measured in patients with ADTKD-UMOD, healthy controls, and patients with other diseases. We investigated whether reduced UMOD levels are a distinctive feature of ADTKD-UMOD.
resultsIn 13 cases of ADTKD-UMOD, the serum UMOD (sUMOD) was 24.5 ± 13.9 ng/ml, the serum UMOD/GFR (sUMOD/GFR) was 1.23 ± 0.96, and the urinary UMOD/Cr (uUMOD/Cr) was 1.8 ± 0.9 mg/gcr. In the ADTKD-UMOD dataset, the sUMOD values were significantly lower than those in the other disease datasets. The UMOD/Cr and sUMOD/eGFR values also tended to be lower, although statistically significant differences were observed only in limited comparisons. The ROC analysis revealed that a serum UMOD concentration of < 56.4 ng/ml or sUMOD/GFR of < 1.71 is strongly suggestive of ADTKD-UMOD.
conclusionsMeasurement of UMOD protein levels is a useful tool for the diagnosis of ADTKD-UMOD. Considering the stability of the procedure, serum UMOD may be more reliable than urinary UMOD measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.