ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Evaluating the impact of a longitudinal mentorship intervention on the documentation of maternal vital signs in Blantyre district, Malawi.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStaff shortages, insufficient training and support, and high patient caseloads limit maternal quality of care (QoC) and influence poor documentation of vital signs and labor progress in Malawi. Aware that this limits providers’ ability to anticipate or manage complications, we explored the impact of a longitudinal multipronged intervention on the documentation of maternal vital signs at key clinical times during childbirth to identify targeted opportunities for improvement.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective quantitative analysis of maternal charts from two primary health centres in Blantyre district in Malawi to assess for differences in the documentation of vital signs established in the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC). The intervention consisted of short course training followed by 12 months of bedside mentorship. Bivariate and multivariate analyses assessed differences in the recording of each vital sign both pre- and post-intervention as well as according to availability of the appropriate device for that vital sign.
resultsA total of 271 maternal charts—96 from the pre-intervention period and 175 from the post-intervention period—were analyzed and found to have recorded between 2% and 52% of key maternal vital signs at the SCC-designated times. Post-intervention charts showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in the documentation of heart rate/pulse and blood pressure both upon admission and immediately postpartum, though not at the time of active childbirth. Additionally, while few maternal charts included all vital signs, there was a significant increase in the number of vital signs recorded between the pre- and post-intervention periods. A sub-analysis explored the impact of the availability of key medical devices on documentation during the post-intervention period and found that the recorded availability of thermometers and blood pressure cuffs were not significantly associated with whether temperature or blood pressure was recorded, respectively. However, at admission, significantly more vital signs were recorded when all a centre’s medical devices were consistently available.
conclusionA deeper exploration into which strategies are most effective for vital sign measurement and how it affects QoC indicators is warranted. Meanwhile, continuing and expanding training followed by supportive mentorship will be key to making sustainable maternal QoC improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.