Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462076›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Batch optimization for balanced binary sequences and DNA sequences.

Yiming Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yiming MaSchool of Cyber Security, University of Science and Technology of China, 96 Jinzhai Road, Hefei, 230026, Anhui Province, China. mym024@mail.ustc.edu.cn.

Funding

Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology 2021ZD0302902National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFA1010201National Natural Science Foundation of China 12171452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA data storage offers exceptional density and longevity, but its practicality is hampered by the high cost and low throughput of de novo DNA synthesis. A key cost driver in array-based synthesis is the length of a common supersequence required to encode a batch of DNA strands.

objectiveThis study aims to address this cost bottleneck by investigating the optimal batch partitioning of DNA sequences. Our goal is to minimize the total synthesis cost, which is defined as the sum of the lengths of the shortest common supersequences (SCS) across all batches.

resultsGiven a large pool [Formula: see text] of balanced binary sequences, which is partitioned into k batches with almost equal size, we define the total cost of [Formula: see text] to be the sum of lengths of the shortest common supersequence (SCS) of all sequences in each batch. The central problem is to determine the minimum total cost of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], among all partitions into k batches.

conclusionsWhen [Formula: see text] is the set of all balanced binary sequences of length 2n, we use combinatorial methods to obtain [Formula: see text] for any positive n, and [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] and large n with C a constant depending on k. Similarly, we get [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text] and large n when [Formula: see text] is the set of all balanced DNA sequences of length 2n. Previously, the probabilistic model of this problem was studied by Makarychev et al. (IEEE Trans Inf Theory 68:7454-7470, 2022), where strings are unconstrained or without consecutive identical letters.

Indexed as

DNASequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsBase SequenceDNABalanced codesBatch optimizationDNA storageDNA synthesisThe shortest common supersequence

Identifiers

PMID41462076
PMCPMC12750718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.