ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Improving protein interaction prediction in GenPPi: a novel interaction sampling approach preserving network topology.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards million-token context windows: a topology-preserving framework for adaptive transformer sparsification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- In silico interactome analysis reveals distinct and complementary metabolic roles of bacteria in stingless bee larval food.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Beyond Methane Oxidation: The Protein Landscape of ANME-2a Reveals an Integrated System for Diazotrophy and Membrane Fortification.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputational prediction of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is crucial for understanding cell biology and drug development, offering an alternative to costly experimental methods. The original GenPPi software advanced ab initio PPI network prediction from bacterial genomes but was limited by its reliance on high sequence similarity. This work introduces GenPPi 1.5 to enhance these predictive capabilities.
resultsGenPPi 1.5 incorporates a Random Forest (RF) algorithm, trained on 60 biophysical features from amino acid propensity indices, to classify protein similarity even in low sequence identity scenarios (targeting >65% identity). To manage computational complexity from the increased interactions generated by the RF model, especially in extensive conserved phylogenetic profiles, we developed and integrated the Reduced Interaction Sampling (RIS) algorithm. RIS stochastically samples interactions within these profiles, optimizing performance for complete genome analysis. Extensive simulations across various configurations validated the methodology. RF integration significantly broadened GenPPi's predictive power; application to Buchnera aphidicola showed up to 62% overlap with STRING database interactions. Analysis of RIS demonstrated that while introducing some randomness, critical node identification remains robust, particularly for Top_N values ≥ 100, indicating minimal compromise to network integrity.
conclusionThe combination of Machine Learning (RF) and the RIS algorithm in GenPPi 1.5 represents a significant advancement. It overcomes the high-similarity dependency of the previous version while efficiently handling complex genomes. GenPPi 1.5 provides a robust and scalable alignment-free PPI prediction solution, enabling users to train custom models tailored to specific genomic contexts. GenPPi is freely available on our website https://genppi.facom.ufu.br/ , its source code is hosted on GitHub https://github.com/santosardr/genppi , and it can be easily installed via the Python Package Index using the command pip install genppi-py.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.