ArticleScientific reports2025
No naturally occurring blood group antibodies were detected in the crossmatching of 25 giant pandas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is a vulnerable species of ursid, endemic to China. With over eight million years of evolution, it is considered a living fossil. Blood transfusion is an important means to treat giant pandas that are critically ill or severely injured, however the blood grouping of giant pandas, as the first element of blood transfusion, has not yet been clarified. Based on immunohematology, the saline-tube test, polybrene test and antigen test were carried out to detect IgM and IgG antibodies in the blood of giant pandas in this study. In parallel, human ABO typing reagent and lectin were used to identify whether the RBCs of giant pandas had a similar antigen as the human ABO blood group system. Here we found that there was no clinically significant agglutination in the crossmatching, indicating that giant pandas most likely lack naturally occurring blood group antibodies, unlike what is observed by incompatibility in humans. And due to the presence of interspecies antibodies, human blood typing reagents could not be used for the identification of giant panda blood types. This finding is of great significance for guiding the clinical blood transfusion of giant pandas. Although this study represents the largest cohort of giant panda blood typing to date, the sample size is still insufficient for species-level blood typing. New findings may emerge, especially as the genetic diversity of the sample increases (such as the introduction of wild populations). A major obstacle currently restricting the study of giant panda blood groupings is the preservation technology of giant panda blood. This requires extensive involvement of engineers and biologists in addition to hematologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.