ArticleScientific reports2025
Neuromorphic robust framework for integrated estimation and control in dynamical systems using spiking neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Synchronization-Driven Learning Rule for Pattern Separation in Self-Organizing Probabilistic Spiking Neural Networks.Research square · 2026Article
- Spiking neurons as predictive controllers of linear systems.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic robust framework for integrated estimation and control in dynamical systems using spiking neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrated estimation and control present an ongoing challenge for robotic systems. Because controllers depend on data derived from measured states and parameters, which are often subject to uncertainties and noise. The suitability of frameworks depends on the complexity of the task and the constraints of computational resources. They must strike a balance between computational efficiency for rapid responses while maintaining accuracy and robustness for safe and reliable missions. This study capitalizes on recent advancements in neuromorphic computing tools, especially spiking neural networks (SNNs), and their applications in robotic and dynamical systems. We present a learning-free framework featuring a recurrent network of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons, designed to mimic a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) provided by a robust filtering strategy called extended modified sliding innovation filter (EMSIF). Thus, our proposed framework benefits from the robustness of EMSIF and the computational efficiency of SNN. The weight matrices of SNN are tailored to match the desired system model, eliminating the need for training. Moreover, the network leverages a biologically plausible firing rule akin to predictive coding. Furthermore, in the presence of various uncertainties, the SNN-LQR-EMSIF compared with non-spiking LQR-EMSIF, and the optimal strategy called linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) based on extended Kalman filter. We evaluate their performance in a workbench problem and, next in the satellite rendezvous maneuver implement the Clohessy-Wiltshire (CW) model. Results demonstrated that the SNN-LQR-EMSIF achieves acceptable performance in terms of computational efficiency, robustness, and accuracy, positioning it as a promising approach for addressing the challenges of Integrated estimation and control in dynamic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.