Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41462039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Histopathological changes in Melanopsis praemorsa exposed to imidacloprid and the protective effect of ascorbic acid.

Lokman Damar, Birgül Otludil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lokman DamarDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Dicle University, 21280, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Birgül OtludilDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Dicle University, 21280, Diyarbakır, Turkey. birgulotl@dicle.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-498X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of neonicotinoid pesticides, particularly imidacloprid, poses significant risks to aquatic ecosystems. This study investigates the histopathological effects of sublethal concentrations of imidacloprid (4.016 µg/L, 40.16 µg/L, and 80.32 µg/L) on the hepatopancreas and mantle tissues of Melanopsis praemorsa and evaluates the protective role of ascorbic acid. Snails were exposed to imidacloprid, with and without ascorbic acid, under laboratory conditions for 7, 14, and 21 days. Histopathological analysis revealed severe tissue damage, including vacuolation in digestive cells, hypertrophy of basophilic cells, lipid accumulation, and necrosis in the hepatopancreas. In the mantle, epithelial desquamation, muscle fiber atrophy, and increased lipid vacuoles were observed. However, ascorbic acid mitigated these effects, reducing the severity of tissue damage. The extent of histopathological alterations correlated with imidacloprid concentration and exposure duration. These findings suggest that M. praemorsa can serve as a bioindicator for pesticide pollution, and ascorbic acid may play a protective role against oxidative damage in aquatic organisms.

Indexed as

Ascorbic AcidInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsSnailsAnimalsAntioxidantsHepatopancreasWater Pollutants, ChemicalAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidimidaclopridInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAquatic toxicologyAscorbic acidBioindicatorHistopathologyImidaclopridMelanopsis praemorsa

Identifiers

PMID41462039
PMCPMC12749367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.