ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid grey Wolf-Cuckoo search optimized linear quadratic regulator for robust quadrotor control.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer-Tuned LQR Attitude Control of a Three-DOF Hover System.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate position and altitude control of quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is essential for mission-critical applications such as surveillance, defense, and autonomous delivery. This study introduces an innovative control framework that integrates a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) with a hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer-Cuckoo Search (GWO-CS) algorithm for optimal gain tuning. The innovation lies in combining GWO's global exploration with CS's local exploitation, ensuring faster convergence and higher-quality tuning of LQR weighting matrices. A comprehensive nonlinear dynamic model of the quadrotor was developed using the Newton-Euler formalism, and the LQR-GWO-CS controller was implemented in a simulated environment. Comparative analysis reveals that the proposed controller achieves significant improvements. For the X-axis, the settling time is reduced from 4.08 s (LQR) and 7.36 s (LQR-GWO) to 1.70 s with zero overshoot, while the Integral Absolute Error (IAE) improves by approximately 39% compared to the conventional LQR. For the Y-axis, the proposed method reduced the IAE from 1.16 (LQR) to 0.70 with a settling time of 1.64 s and zero overshoot, outperforming LQR-WOA, which exhibited 4.2% overshoot. In altitude (Z-axis) control, the proposed controller limited overshoot to 2.0% while reducing settling time from 4.27 s (LQR) to 1.96 s, with lower IAE than both LQR and LQR-WOA. Robustness was further demonstrated under external disturbances and validated through real-time Hardware-in-the-Loop testing on OPAL-RT (Operational and Automation Platform for Real-Time applications), confirming feasibility for practical UAV missions. Overall, the LQR-GWO-CS framework outperforms state-of-the-art controllers, offering a quantitatively validated, robust, and efficient solution for UAV operation in dynamic and uncertain environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.