ArticleScientific reports2025
Transfer learning models for wheat ear detection on multi-source dataset.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- OPTIFARM: Benchmarking YOLO Architectures for Location-Robust Potato Quality Detection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring wheat growth, as one of the most important food grain sources for human nutrition, and forecasting yields are done through different phenological phases. Reliable estimates on yields play a crucial role in securing sufficient food supplies for the world's growing population. Currently, farmers estimate a wheat yield during the later stages of growth and are often biased in this process. Plant breeding scientists use a more accurate approach that collects data on the number of wheat ears manually counted at various locations throughout the field. A sufficiently precise count of wheat ears is one of the most important parameters for reliable early-stage prediction of wheat yield. To support the development of an affordable and trustworthy automated wheat ear detection approach, this work introduces a novel high-quality RGB smartphone image dataset, BioS-Wheat, comprising 5,696 annotated images across four wheat varieties. Additionally, it evaluates six deep learning models for wheat ear detection. Among the F-RCNN-based models, RetinaNet, YOLOv8, and a Vision Transformer-based detector, RT-DETR, achieved the highest mean Average Precision (mAP@50) of 91%, with significantly higher computational complexity. BioS-Wheat complements Global Wheat Head Detection datasets, introducing a meaningful shift in data complexity with high sowing density and minimal row spacing, emphasizing the impact of agronomic diversity on model performance by an increased object occlusion and dense spatial arrangements. Enriched and agronomically diverse datasets support model robustness at different varieties, growth stages, and locations. This work offers a good baseline for establishing the procedure for image crowdsourcing, further dataset expansions, and model improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.